Wrestlling

WWE Continues To Re-arrange Pay Per Views

Back to home

In the latest Pay Per View shuffle by the WWE, they have moved their "Night Of Champions" show to September.

 

The December issue of WWE Magazine gives a preview of the Pay Per View dates.

* Backlash – April 25, 2010 (Baltimore, MD)
* Extreme Rules – May 23, 2010
* Summerslam – August 15, 2010
* Night of Champions – September 19, 2010 (Rosemont, IL)
* Hell in a Cell – October 3, 2010
* Bragging Rights – October 24, 2010
* Survivor Series – November 21, 2010 

 

Source: wrestlingnewsworld.com


Views: 2,112
The Wrestling Game

COMMENTS

Comment # 1

y are there 2 in october?

Posted by on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 2

night of champions sucks

Posted by azuzu on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 3

why there no pay per view show on june and july?

Posted by wwe rule#2 on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 4

#3, they said they want a bigger build up before summerslam, that might be why.

Posted by on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 5

I personally think that these changes in Pay-Per-View might hurt the WWE. I mean a lot of the old Pay-Per-View (i.e Backlash) started off as an 2 hour Pay-Per-View to fill in the top Pay-Per-View like Wrestlemainia and such before they became top Pay-Per-View, unlike nowadays where the WWE is just creating a big Pay-Per-View event to see if it turns out ok.

Posted by on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 6

Wow, 2 weeks time between NoC and Hell in a Cell... Gonna be quite the buildup there. Not.

Posted by Crymson Myst on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 7

Is it just me, or are there seriously too many damn PPVs? I mean, why not just have at most 6 PPVs per year? That way you have solid storylines...and great exposure without making the whole thing appear trite and trivial like it currently appears to be. Ah well, what do I know. ;)

Posted by Koj Tije Dedo on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 8

So they got zero PPVs in June and July and 2 PPVs in October? Thats pretty dumb, not enough time to build up a decent story. WWE has way too many PPVs here, Hell in a Cell shouldn't even be a PPV event. They are making way to many changes and it is hurting the company

Posted by on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 9

Did they get rid of Breaking point?

Posted by The Renegation on Tuesday, November 03, 2009


Comment # 10

All the new PPVs suck. No judgement day? wtf!!! wwe is just creating new PPVs for the hell of it. Breaking Point sucked, Bragging Rights was a crappy version of Survior Series, TLC shouldn't have replaced Armaggedon. Armaggedon was badass!!!

Posted by Tyler Higdon on Wednesday, November 04, 2009


WRITE YOUR COMMENT
Your name:
Comments:
Verification code:
Code Image - Please contact webmaster if you have problems seeing this image code
Load a new image
Warning, please copy the letters respecting the caps locks as the image is showing.